This blog is not concerned with analyzing my favourite city map; rather, it will attempt to disseminate some of the key concerns I have with an authority (in this case the Edmonton Police Service) systematically categorizing and mapping the achievements of their industry. For starters, the mandatory disclaimer, which is prompted prior to accessing any information, essentially removes the “authority” from bearing any affiliation to the legitimacy of the site’s information. In my opinion, disclaimers 1, 2 and 5 are inherently contradictory to the sites main initiative, which is arguably to provide citizens of the Edmonton area the opportunity to participate in a community policing initiative.
Prior to accessing the site, citizens must understand and agree that: you cannot sue the EPS for anything related to the site [disclaimer 1]; delays, INNACURACIES AND OMMISSIONS (my emphasis) can occur [disclaimer 2]—and most likely will depending on the nature of the crime; and, finally, that the locations shown on the map are near but are not the exact locations reported to the police [disclaimer 5]. Well, how close is near? Within one street? One block? One community? How many inaccuracies and omissions occur? We are aware from the layout of the site alone that all “white collar” crimes have been omitted, as well as all crimes involving weapons and narcotics.
If one is to assume that the mapping of city space is a credible and legitimate process when conducted by an “authority” in our society; then I believe one should also assume complete and total disclosure is mandatory as well. Without question, the information posited on this site affects public opinion—especially when one attempts to determine the appropriateness of space utilization. With respect to my community, Oliver Square, the amount of crimes situated on this map certainly sways public opinion of the area, which, in turn, influences property value, local businesses and economic growth. This wouldn’t be such an issue if, and only if, the EPS absolutely stood behind the credibility of the site’s sources and information. Without complete disclosure, I believe this map does not eclipse the boundaries of gossip and hearsay.
"I believe this map does not eclipse the boundaries of gossip and hearsay"
ReplyDeleteInterestingly, gossip and hearsay seems to be the natural way we map our neighborhoods. You hear about what happens in your community through the "grapevine" or town gossip. It's not always accurate, but it gives you a "sense" of what is going on in your community.
ALTHOUGH, that being said, I think it is morally gray at BEST to make the site seem somehow official by tagging it with the EPS authority. They are essentially releasing knowingly, inaccurate information(the map) through an Official portal(the website).